Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sebastian Sorger vs Sander Jong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sorger vs Jong analysis and find out who is favored!
Sebastian Sorger vs Sander Jong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sorger 0 - 1 Jong
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sorger has won 48.63% of points on his second serve, while Jong has won 52.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sorger, in recent form, has won 53.39% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jong has won 48.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.86% and 33.97% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sorger has saved 57.08% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jong has saved 54.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sorger has won 50.82% of matches played (W/L 31/ 30), with Jong winning 69.05% (W/L 58/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sorger has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 44/ 27), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 49/ 41). Jong has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 6/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 19/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Sorger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.54% of matches (W/L 31/ 28), where as Jong has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.88% of matches (W/L 58/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sorger winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Sorger winning 1 and Jong winning 2. The last match between Sorger and Jong was at the M15 Prijedor, 18-05-2024, Semifinals, Clay with Sander Jong getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:23:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sorger and Jong have played a deciding set 1 times, with Sorger winning 0 times and Jong 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sorger winning 0, and Jong 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sorger has played against opponents with an average rank of 227.1 while Jong has played against players with an average rank of 169.17.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sorger has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jong has won 71% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sorger has converted 41.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jong has converted 43.24% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
747
Rank
689
High
18
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
478
Rank
478
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
58% (93-68)
Career Total W/L
65% (74-40)
50% (11-11)
YTD W/L
67% (22-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sebastian Sorger | Sander Jong |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 12 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:23:0 | 2:23:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 84% (76/90) | 60% (50/84) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (46/76) | 66% (33/50) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (9/14) | 62% (21/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 33% (3/9) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (30/84) | 39% (35/90) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Sander Jong
Player
Sebastian Sorger
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
84%
(
76 of
90)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sebastian Sorger | Sander Jong |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (11/11) | 67% (22/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (25/26) | 63% (47/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (235/226) | 54% (392/334) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 71% (12/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (10/8) | 69% (9/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.09 | 0.62 |
| Aces Total | 19 | 221 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 29 | 84 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:42 | 1:36:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 226.95 | 175.39 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (1049/1453) | 63% (1296/2053) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (637/1049) | 75% (966/1296) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (204/404) | 53% (404/757) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (81/203) | 43% (86/200) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (699/1586) | 39% (833/2141) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 52% (11/10) | 67% (22/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 45% (9/20) | 67% (22/33) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 50% (5/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 67% (6/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 95% (21/20) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 5% (21/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 17% (12/2) |
Sebastian Sorger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Duarte Vale
Player
Sebastian Sorger
74%
(
71 of
96)
1st Serve %
87%
(
66 of
76)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Sorger
Player
Josip Simundza
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
49%
(
42 of
85)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Sorger
Player
Janos Fekete
81%
(
80 of
99)
1st Serve %
82%
(
76 of
93)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
43 of
76)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
96
|
6-1 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Sebastian Sorger
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
84%
(
76 of
90)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Sorger
Player
Lilian Marmousez
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve %
36%
(
8 of
22)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
23
Total Points Won
17
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Sorger
Player
Dusan Obradovic
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Sorger
Player
Charlie Camus
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
12 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Sebastian Sorger
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Sebastian Sorger
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Sorger
Player
Matic Kriznik
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Sander Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Sander Jong
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Corentin Denolly
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
4
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Marc Antoine Gaillard
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Adam Briant
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Pawel Juszczak
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
70
|
6-1 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Sebastian Sorger
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
84%
(
76 of
90)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Sasa Markovic
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Marcel Zielinski
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Kirill Mishkin
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Sander Jong
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
39 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Sorger Vs Jong Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
